Togay Koç
/ Categories: Abstracts, 2019, Podium

The role of rotation in total ankle replacement

A.-A. Najefi, Y. Ghani, A. Goldberg

Background: The importance of total ankle replacement (TAR) implant orientation in the axial plane is poorly understood with major variation in surgical technique of implants on the market. Our aims were to better understand the axial rotational profile of patients undergoing TAR.

Methods: In 157 standardised CT Scans of end-stage ankle arthritis patients planning to undergo primary TAR surgery, we measured the relationship between the knee posterior condylar axis, the tibial tuberosity, the transmalleolar axis(TMA) and the tibiotalar angle. The foot position was measured in relation to the TMA with the foot plantigrade. The variation between medial gutter line and the line bisecting both gutters was assessed.

Results: The mean external tibial torsion was 34.5±10.3°(11.8-62°). When plantigrade the mean foot position relative to the TMA was 21±10.6°(0.7-38.4°) internally rotated. As external tibial torsion increased, the foot position became more internally rotated relative to the TMA(pearson correlation 0.6;p< 0.0001). As the tibiotalar angle became more valgus, the foot became more externally rotated relative to the TMA(pearson correlation -0.4;p< 0.01). The mean difference between the medial gutter line and a line bisecting both gutters was 4.9±2.8°(1.7°-9.4°). More than 51% of patients had a difference greater than 5°. The mean angle between the medial gutter line and a line perpendicular to the TMA was 7.5°±2.6°(2.8°-13.7°).

Conclusion: There is a large variation in rotational profile of patients undergoing TAR, particularly between the medial gutter line and the transmalleolar axis. Surgeon designers and implant manufacturers need to develop consistent methods to guide surgeons towards judging appropriate axial rotation of their implanton an individual basis. We recommend careful clinical assessment and CT scans pre-operatively to enable the correct rotation to be determined.

Previous Article Early outcomes of revision total ankle arthoplasty using the INBONE II and INVISION systems
Next Article The Hintegra Total Ankle Replacement: survivorship, failure modes and patient reported outcomes in 70 consecutive cases with a minimum 5 year follow up
Print