Togay Koç
/ Categories: Abstracts, 2015, Podium

Revision total ankle replacement to a hind-foot fusion with a nail; the experience from Leeds

A.A. Ali, P. O'Connor, N. Harris

Introduction: We present a series of 23 total ankle replacements revised for balloon osteolysis and aseptic loosening with a hind-foot fusion nail without the use of bone graft. This is the largest series of total ankle replacements revised to a hindfoot fusion with a nail presented in the literature.

Methods: Initial assessment involved investigations to rule out infection and a CT scan of the ankle to assess the size of cysts. Patients underwent surgery in a single stage procedure. The surgery involved excision of the fibula and preparation of the sub-talar joint through a lateral incision; removal of the implant and preparation of the talar and tibial surface with flat cuts through an anterior incision and safe excision of the medial malleolus aided by a medial incision. The prepared surfaces were then compressed and fixed using a Biomet Phoenix Nail. Patients were then followed up to assess for clinical and radiographic union.

Results: This study involved 18 male and 4 female patients with an average age of 67. All patients had AES ankle replacements (Biomet) in-situ, undergoing revision surgery for aseptic loosening with balloon osteolysis. At a mean follow up of 13.9 months, 96% (22/23) of ankles achieved osseous union across the tibio-talar joint with 1 patient achieving a partial union. 91% (21/23) of patients achieved union across the subtalar joint with 2 patients identified as having a non-union. 1 patient with a subtalar non-union suffered a broken nail and required revision surgery. The only other identifiable complication was a single patient sustained a stress fracture at the proximal tip of the nail, which was treated conservatively.

Conclusions: We believe this method is a reliable and reproducible method of achieving osseous union following a failed total ankle replacement without using graft. Although patients may have a leg length discrepancy, none have requested leg lengthening.

Previous Article Medium term follow-up of the Corin Zenith total ankle replacement in an independent non-inventor cohort
Next Article Platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection for plantar fasciitis: a comparative study
Print