Togay Koç
/ Categories: Abstracts, 2024, Podium

Medial Malleolus: Operative Or Non-operative (MOON): A randomised clinical trial of operative versus non-operative management of associated medial malleolus fractures in unstable ankle fractures

T. Carter, W. Oliver, K. Bell, C. Graham, A.D. Duckworth, T. White, N. Heinz

Introduction: Unstable ankle fractures are routinely managed operatively. Due to soft-tissue and implant related complications, there has been recent literature reporting on the non-operative management of well-reduced medial malleolus fractures following fibular stabilisation, but with limited evidence supporting routine application. This trial assessed the superiority of internal fixation of well-reduced (displacement ≤2mm) medial malleolus fractures compared with non-fixation following fibular stabilisation.

Methods & Participants: Superiority, pragmatic, parallel, prospective randomised clinical trial conducted over a four year period. A total of 154 adult patients with a bi- or trimalleolar fractures were recruited from a single centre. Open injuries and vertical medial malleolar fractures were excluded. Following fibular stabilisation, patients were randomised intra-operatively on a 1:1 basis to fixation or non-fixation after satisfactory fluoroscopic fracture reduction was confirmed. The primary outcome was the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at one-year post-randomisation. Complications and radiographic outcomes were documented over the follow-up period.

Results: Among 154 participants (mean age, 56.5 years; 119 women [77%]), 144 [94%] completed the trial. At oneyear the median OMAS was 80 (IQR, 60-90) in the fixation group compared with 72.5 (IQR, 55-90) in the non-fixation group (p=0.17). Complication rates were comparable. Significantly more patients in the non-fixation group developed a radiographic non-union (20% vs 0%; p<0.001), with the majority (n=8/13) clinically asymptomatic and one patient required surgical re-intervention for this. Fracture type and reduction quality appeared to influence fracture union and patient outcome.

Conclusion: In this randomised clinical trial comparing internal fixation of well-reduced medial malleolus fractures with non-fixation, following fibular stabilisation, fixation was not superior according to the primary outcome. However, 1 in 5 patients following non-fixation developed a radiographic non-union and whilst the re-intervention rate to manage this was low, the future implications require surveillance. These results may support selective non-fixation of anatomically reduced medial malleolus fractures.

Previous Article Deltoid ligament reconstruction in ankle fractures – does it prevent pes planus?
Next Article Evaluating the utility of plain radiograph and computerised tomography scanning in identifying concomitant foot fractures in patients with unstable Lisfranc injuries
Print

Documents to download