Togay Koç
/ Categories: Abstracts, 2013, Poster

Fifth metatarsal fractures: is routine follow-up necessary?

K.B. Ferguson, J. McGlynn, C. Kumar, N.J. Madeley, L. Rymaszewski

Introduction: Fifth metatarsal fractures are common and the majority unite regardless of treatment. A sub-type of these fractures carries a risk of non-union and for this reason many centres follow up all 5th metatarsal fractures. In 2011, a standardised protocol was introduced to promote weight-bearing as tolerated with either a tubigrip or Velcro boot. No routine fracture clinic appointments were made from A&E but patients were provided with information and a help-line number to access care if required. Some patients still attended fracture clinics, but only after review of their notes/X-rays by an Orthopaedic Consultant, or after self-reported “failure to progress” using the special help-line number.

Methods: Audit of a year prior to the introduction of the protocol and the year following it was performed. Patient satisfaction surveys sent at 1 year.

Results: During 2009/2010, 279 patients presented to A&E with a 5th metatarsal fracture and were referred to a fracture clinic. 106(38%) attended 1 appointment, 130(47%) attended 2 appointments and 31 (11%) attended 3 or more appointments - 491 appointments in total. 3% failed to attend the clinic. Operative fixation was performed in 3 patients (1.07%). In 2011/2012, of 339 A&E fractures, only 67 (20%) attended fracture clinic. 38 (11%) attended 1 appointment, 14 (4%) 2 and 9 (3%) 3 or more appointments - 102 appointments in total. 5 patients (1%) required operative fixation.

Conclusion: Our study did not demonstrate any added value for routine outpatient follow-up of 5th metatarsal fractures. Patients can be safely allowed to weight bear and discharged at the time of initial presentation in the A&E department if they are provided with appropriate information and access to a “help line” run by experienced fracture clinic staff. The result is a more efficient, patient- centred service. 77% of surveyed patients were satisfied with the service.

Previous Article Donor leg morbidity after Vascularised Free Fibula Flap: Is there a difference between patients reported outcomes and dynamic ankle stability as assessed by Star Excursion Balance Test
Next Article Pilot study of local anaesthetic peripheral nerve block in forefoot day case surgery: does it work better when administered before the start of the surgical procedure?
Print