BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

 



Categories: Abstracts, 2013, Poster

What proportion of patients eventually require joint fusion following simple ankle fractures?

G. Williams, D. Withers, J. Ballester, D. Bailey

1 Whiston Hospital, Trauma Orthopaedics, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Introduction: The literature contains few outcome studies providing long term follow up for ankle fractures, to our knowledge no studies have defined the medium to long term probability of significant further surgery for this group of patients.

Methods: Using our institutions coding database we identified a cohort of patients (n = 2137) treated for ankle fractures over a 10 year period (Jan 2001 to Dec 2011). Primary data of interest was collected in respect to whether the fracture was managed conservatively or with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and further procedures each patient underwent at our institution.

Results: 73% of the identified fractures were managed non-operatively (n = 1552), 28% (n = 585) underwent ORIF. Of patients treated with ORIF, 58 (8.8%) required metalwork removal. Ankle joint fusion was the eventual outcome for 15 patients (0.7%). 10 patients required ankle joint injections (0.5%) and 2 patients underwent ankle arthroscopy following their fracture (0.1%). Significantly more of the patients requiring eventual joint fusion were from the ORIF group (p = 0.001 Pearson Chi-Squared test, n = 10 vs 5 patients, relative risk 5.3, CI 1.7-17.7). Mean time to fusion or arthroscopy was at 23months (range 1-50months) and 30months (range 9-52months) respectively.

Conclusion: It is practical to assume that more serious fracture patterns would prompt treatment with ORIF and be more likely to result in subsequent ankle arthritis and eventual fusion. Our data supports this hypothesis as the relative risk for ankle fusion was over five times higher for fracture patterns treated with ORIF. Patients can be reassured that overall the probability for significant surgical procedures other than metal work removal is low however our sample may underestimate the additional surgical morbidity and fusion rate.

Previous Article What is the effect of BMI on total ankle replacement and the effect of ankle replacement on BMI?
Next Article Which factors influence the decision to perform computed tomography for primary ankle fractures?
Print


Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts

2024   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2023   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2022   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2021   -   Prize Winners  
2019   -   Podium  |  Poster
2018   -   Podium  |  Poster
2017   -   Podium  |  Poster
2016   -   Podium  |  Poster
2015   -   Podium  |  Poster
2014   -   Podium  |  Poster
2013   -   Podium  |  Poster
2011   -   All Abstracts
2009   -   All Abstracts
2008   -   All Abstracts
2007   -   All Abstracts
2006   -   All Abstracts
2005   -   All Abstracts
2004   -   All Abstracts
2002   -   All Abstracts
2001   -   All Abstracts
2000   -   All Abstracts
1999   -   All Abstracts
1998   -   All Abstracts
1997   -   All Abstracts
1996   -   All Abstracts
1995   -   All Abstracts
1994   -   All Abstracts
1993   -   All Abstracts
1991   -   All Abstracts
1990   -   All Abstracts
1989   -   All Abstracts
1987   -   All Abstracts
1985   -   All Abstracts
1983   -   All Abstracts