BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

Search

RSS Abstracts 476 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2013 64 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 24 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 40 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2014 36 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 36 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2015 49 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 20 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 29 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2016 45 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 18 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 27 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2017 40 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 15 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 25 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2018 47 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 22 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 25 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2019 48 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 25 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 23 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2021 15 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 10 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 6 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2022 46 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 23 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 23 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2023 46 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 23 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 23 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2024 40 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 18 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 22 Expand/Collapse

Categories: Abstracts, 2013, Podium

Severe foot and ankle injuries at trauma units: a relic of the past?

A.G.C. Hay-David, S.A. Clint, R.R. Brown

¹Cheltenham General Hospital, Trauma & Orthopaedics, Cheltenham, United Kingdom

Introduction: In April 2012 National Trauma Networks were introduced in England to optimise the management of major trauma. All patients with an ISS of ≥ 16 should be transferred to the regional Major Trauma Centre (level 1). Our hypothesis was that severe foot and ankle injuries would no longer be managed in Trauma Units (level 2).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the epidemiology of severe foot and ankle injuries was performed, analysing the Gloucestershire foot and ankle trauma database, from a Trauma Unit, for a catchment population of 750,000 people. The rate of open fractures, mangled feet and requirements for stabilisation with external fixation were reviewed before and after the introduction. This was compared to the foot and ankle injuries triaged to the regional Major Trauma Centre (MTC) using the TARN database information.

Results: The incidence of open foot and ankle injuries was 2.9 per 100,000 per year. There were 5.1% open injuries before the Network and 3.2% after. There was no statistically significant change in the application of external fixators. The frequency of mangled feet was 3.6% before and 6% after the Network commenced, showing no significant fall. Analysis of TARN data from the MTC demonstrated that only 18% of patients had an ISS ≥ 16. The majority of patients brought to the MTC with foot and ankle injuries were either polytrauma patients (43%) or required plastic surgery intervention for open fractures (69%). Only 4.5% of patients had isolated, closed foot and ankle injuries.

Conclusion: We found there to be no decrease in our numbers of mangled ankles, external fixations nor open fractures following the introduction of the Trauma Network. There is still a need for Foot & Ankle Surgeons at Trauma Units to manage complex foot and ankle injuries, because the majority have an ISS < 16.

Print

Tags: Fracture Trauma

Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts