BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

 



Categories: Abstracts, 2013, Poster

One year of ankle fractures on the Wirral: how was the syndesmosis managed?

M.J. Grant, D.M. Machin, H. Carden, N.P. Unnikrishnan, S.R. Platt, M.S. Hennessy

1 Arrowe Park Hospital, Trauma & Orthopaedics, Upton, United Kingdom

Introduction: Ankle fractures are operated on by most trauma surgeons regardless of sub specialty. The subtlety of the Syndesmosis injury is very important and must not be missed.

Methods: We analysed 124 consecutive operated ankle fractures over 12 months in our institution. Data was collected on all patients who underwent surgery for ankle fractures from initial management to discharge. Radiographs, intra-operative data and clinical notes were reviewed by a single foot and ankle surgeon (DM). Exclusion criteria were; patients who had a manipulation only, skeletally immature patients, and non-ankle fractures. All should have had an intraoperative, radiographically documented syndesmosis test and, if unstable, fixation.

Results: Female:Male 77:47, mean age 49.0, range 14-97. The primary surgeon: senior registrar 46.8%, foot and ankle fellow or consultant 33.9%. Weber classification was A = 1.6%, B = 62.9%, C = 31.5%, isolated medial malleolar fractures = 4.0%. A documented intraoperative syndesmosis test was performed in 29.8% (hook = 37.9%, rotation = 56.8%, tap test = 5.4%) and of these 7 went on to have a syndesmosis fixation. Of the patients who did not have a documented intraoperative syndesmosis test, 2 patients progressed to revision surgery to fix the syndesmosis. The syndesmosis fixation used was (1 screw = 59.5%, 2 screws = 35.7%, 1 tightrope = 2.4%, 2 tightropes = 2.4%). A total of 5 patients (4.0%) who were operated on at the trust, went on to require revision surgery; 2 of these for an unstable syndesmosis post primary operation. Neither had a documented intraoperative Syndesmosis test. There was 1 patient who had their primary fixation elsewhere that required revision surgery at our trust for syndesmotic stabilisation.

Conclusion: We have demonstrated the importance of routinely testing and documenting the stability of the syndesmosis intraoperatively in all cases. This will help to decrease revision surgery.

Previous Article One stop MDT foot and ankle clinic: our experience and results
Next Article Opposing flanks versus parallel flanks – the influence of headless screw design on compression and pull-out resistance
Print


Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts

2024   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2023   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2022   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2021   -   Prize Winners  
2019   -   Podium  |  Poster
2018   -   Podium  |  Poster
2017   -   Podium  |  Poster
2016   -   Podium  |  Poster
2015   -   Podium  |  Poster
2014   -   Podium  |  Poster
2013   -   Podium  |  Poster
2011   -   All Abstracts
2009   -   All Abstracts
2008   -   All Abstracts
2007   -   All Abstracts
2006   -   All Abstracts
2005   -   All Abstracts
2004   -   All Abstracts
2002   -   All Abstracts
2001   -   All Abstracts
2000   -   All Abstracts
1999   -   All Abstracts
1998   -   All Abstracts
1997   -   All Abstracts
1996   -   All Abstracts
1995   -   All Abstracts
1994   -   All Abstracts
1993   -   All Abstracts
1991   -   All Abstracts
1990   -   All Abstracts
1989   -   All Abstracts
1987   -   All Abstracts
1985   -   All Abstracts
1983   -   All Abstracts