BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

 



Categories: Abstracts, 2025-Jan, Podium

Is the Distal Metatarsal Metaphyseal Angle really just Metatarsal Pronation? A weightbearing CT analysis

A Vijapur, M Shaath, S Patel, N Cullen, M Welck, K Malhotra

1Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, London

Aims: The distal metatarsal metaphyseal articular angle (DMMA) is a measurement used in the surgical decision making of hallux valgus correction. However, it is difficult to measure on plain radiographs, is subject to projection bias, and its role in pathology is unclear. With the advent of weight-bearing CT (WBCT), our understanding of hallux valgus as a multiplanar deformity has evolved. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between the DMAA and pronation of the first metatarsal head in patients with hallux valgus.

Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective analysis of 50 patients with hallux valgus deformity who had WBCTs obtained as part of routine pre-operative work-up. Patients with metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis, hindfoot deformity and previous surgery were excluded. From the WBCT images digital radiographs were created and the DMMA measured. Measurements were taken by 2 authors, each repeated twice and the average of all four measurements used in analysis. We also measured intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA) and metatarsal pronation angle (MPA).

Results: There were 41 females and 9 males, mean age 52.4±15.8 years. IMA was 14.5±3.3 degrees, HVA was 29.3±8.4 degrees, MPA was 11.7±6.3 degrees, and DMMA was 15.5±5.3 degrees. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intra-observer reliability was 0.829 for assessor 1 and 0.910 for assessor 2. ICC for inter-observer reliability was 0.727. Pearsons correlation revealed no link between IMA and DMAA, nor HVA and DMMA. However, there was a significant (albeit small) correlation between MPA and DMMA (r=0.337, p=0.017).

Conclusion: There was reasonable reliability in measuring DMMA between authors on WBCT. Despite this, DMMA appeared to increase with increasing metatarsal pronation. The DMMA may therefore be (in part) projection artefact secondary to metatarsal pronation and surgeons should be aware of this during surgical planning.

Previous Article Is the diagnosis of 5th metatarsal fracture subtype consistent? An inter-observer reliability study
Next Article Is there improvement in plantar pressures patterns following total ankle replacement? – A prospective novel 1 year follow up study
Print

Documents to download


Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts

2024   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2023   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2022   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2021   -   Prize Winners  
2019   -   Podium  |  Poster
2018   -   Podium  |  Poster
2017   -   Podium  |  Poster
2016   -   Podium  |  Poster
2015   -   Podium  |  Poster
2014   -   Podium  |  Poster
2013   -   Podium  |  Poster
2011   -   All Abstracts
2009   -   All Abstracts
2008   -   All Abstracts
2007   -   All Abstracts
2006   -   All Abstracts
2005   -   All Abstracts
2004   -   All Abstracts
2002   -   All Abstracts
2001   -   All Abstracts
2000   -   All Abstracts
1999   -   All Abstracts
1998   -   All Abstracts
1997   -   All Abstracts
1996   -   All Abstracts
1995   -   All Abstracts
1994   -   All Abstracts
1993   -   All Abstracts
1991   -   All Abstracts
1990   -   All Abstracts
1989   -   All Abstracts
1987   -   All Abstracts
1985   -   All Abstracts
1983   -   All Abstracts