BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

 



Categories: Abstracts, 2025-Jan, Podium

Does return to physical activity differ between Ankle Arthrodesis versus Total ankle replacement - 1 Year follow up study

F Jabbar, A Nicolas, S Chambers, P Torres, S Qasim, M Siddique, J Ramaskandhan

1Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle

Background: The ability to return to physical activity is an important indicator of surgical success for end-stage ankle arthritis. There is paucity of literature comparing outcomes between surgical procedures. This study aimed to compare outcomes for physical activity and return to function between total ankle replacement (TAR) and ankle arthrodesis (AA) at 1-year follow-up.

Methods: This was a single-centre prospective follow-up study. Patients who underwent TAR (n=33) or AA (n=25) between 2022-2023 completed questionnaires on FAOS scores (Pain, Symptoms, ADL and QOL domains), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), satisfaction scores and return to work/driving. IPAQ physical activities were compared across domains of work, transportation, domestic and leisure activities.

Results: AA patients were younger (59.1 vs. 65.8). The AA group had better average FAOS scores for pain, symptoms, ADL, and QOL compared to TAR (51.2 vs. 29.2; 40.6 vs. 67.8, 46.8 vs. 66.4, 31.3 vs. 48.3) (p=0.526), but the TAR group reported higher overall satisfaction (77% vs. 66.6%).Earliest return to work was reported at 2 weeks (TAR) vs. 3 weeks (AA) group and driving at 3 weeks (TAR) vs. 4 weeks (AA). More TAR patients returned to vigorous (25%) and moderate (17.6%) physical activity versus AA (0% and 0%). For transport, 4 AA patients vs. 12 TAR patients returned to this activity. AA patients travelled 30 minutes to 2 hours per week, while TAR patients travelled 30 minutes to 5 hours. For household activities, 15.7% of TAR patients reported vigorous activity versus 0% in AA. AA patients spent less time on average leisure walking (1.25 hrs vs. 2 hrs), and more time sitting per day (9.2 hrs vs. 5.9 hrs).

Conclusion: The TAR group demonstrated earlier return to work, driving, and higher levels of physical activity compared to AA patients at 1-year follow-up, despite the AA group having better FAOS scores.

Previous Article Does intra-osseous fixation with the IO FiX improve force and contact area in foot and ankle fusions?
Next Article Does the measure of Achilles Tendon Resting Angle correlate with outcome after functional bracing and rehabilitation for Achilles rupture?
Print

Documents to download


Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts

2024   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2023   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2022   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2021   -   Prize Winners  
2019   -   Podium  |  Poster
2018   -   Podium  |  Poster
2017   -   Podium  |  Poster
2016   -   Podium  |  Poster
2015   -   Podium  |  Poster
2014   -   Podium  |  Poster
2013   -   Podium  |  Poster
2011   -   All Abstracts
2009   -   All Abstracts
2008   -   All Abstracts
2007   -   All Abstracts
2006   -   All Abstracts
2005   -   All Abstracts
2004   -   All Abstracts
2002   -   All Abstracts
2001   -   All Abstracts
2000   -   All Abstracts
1999   -   All Abstracts
1998   -   All Abstracts
1997   -   All Abstracts
1996   -   All Abstracts
1995   -   All Abstracts
1994   -   All Abstracts
1993   -   All Abstracts
1991   -   All Abstracts
1990   -   All Abstracts
1989   -   All Abstracts
1987   -   All Abstracts
1985   -   All Abstracts
1983   -   All Abstracts