BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

Search

RSS Abstracts 518 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2013 64 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 24 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 40 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2014 36 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 36 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2015 49 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 20 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 29 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2016 45 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 18 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 27 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2017 40 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 15 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 25 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2018 47 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 22 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 25 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2019 48 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 25 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 23 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2021 15 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 10 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 6 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2022 46 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 23 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 23 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2023 46 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 23 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 23 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2024 40 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 18 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 22 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2025-Jan 42 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 20 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 22 Expand/Collapse

Categories: Abstracts, 2025-Jan, Podium

Clinical comparison of fixed bearing versus mobile bearing total ankle replacement

S Bitar, J Davenport, M Karski, J Ring, R Smith, T Clough

¹Wrightington Hospital, Wrightington

Second Trainee Podium Prize

Aims: We compared the clinical outcomes of a fixed bearing (Infinity) and a mobile bearing (Zenith) ankle replacement in a demographically similar group of patients, from a single, non designer centre.

Methods: Between December 2010 and May 2016, 118 consecutive mobile bearing prostheses (Zenith) and between September 2017 and November 2019, 118 consecutive fixed bearing (Infinity) prostheses were implanted in a total cohort of 230 patients. Demographic, clinical, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) data were collected. The end point of the study was failure of the implant requiring revision of one or more of the components. Kaplan Meier survival tables were generated.

Results: Demographics were similar for both groups (age, pre-operative arthritic diagnosis and co-morbidities). 32 patients (36 ankles) died during follow-up, but none required revision. Of the surviving 198 patients (200 ankles; 93 Zenith, 107 Infinity), mean follow-up was 9.1 years (6.0 - 13.1 years) for Zenith and 5.0 years for Infinity (3.6 €“ 6.8 years). A total of 11 implants (9.3%) failed for Zenith and 1 implant (0.8%) failed for Infinity, requiring revision. Average time to failure for Zenith was 3.4 years (0.4 - 10.5 years) and the time to failure for Infinity was 4.1 years. Implant survival at five years, using revision as an endpoint, was 91.3% for Zenith and 98.7% for Infinity. There was a mean improvement in Manchester-Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ) from 85.0 to 32.8 for Zenith and 79.3 to 26.4 for Infinity, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores from 7.0 to 3.2 for Zenith and 6.9 to 2.7 for Infinity. The commonest reason for revision was aseptic loosening for both implants.

Conclusion: Our results show a significantly better survivorship for the fixed bearing over the mobile bearing prosthesis. Whilst the fixed bearing prosthesis had better PROMS scores, this was not significant.

Print

Tags: Ankle TAR

Documents to download

FP5---Bitar-Samer-Bitar(.pdf, 596.76 KB) - 60 download(s)

Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts