BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

 



Categories: Abstracts, 2021, Poster

Anatomy of the sural nerve in the posterolateral approach to the ankle: a cadaveric study

Y. Ghani, A.A. Najefi, Y. Aljabi, K. Vemulapalli

1Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Aylesbury, United Kingdom
2East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust , Lister Hospital, Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Stevenage, United Kingdom
3Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnet Hospital, Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, London, United Kingdom
4Barking Havering and Redbridge NHS Trust, Queens Hospital, Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Romford, United Kingdom
 
Winner of the BOFAS 2021 Best Poster Prize

Background: Sural nerve injury may occur during the posterolateral approach to the ankle. The aim of this study was to map the sural nerve location in a posterolateral ankle approach in cadaveric specimens and allow surgeons to be aware of the anatomy and variations, thereby reducing the risk of sural nerve injuries.

Methods: A posterolateral approach was used in 28 cadaver legs with the incision made half-way between the medial border of the fibula and the lateral border of Achilles tendon, extending proximally from the tip of the lateral malleolus. The sural nerve was identified and the distance from the distal tip of the incision to where it crossed the incision proximally was measured.

Results: Out of the 28 specimens, there were 2 specimens in which the sural nerve did not cross the incision. Therefore, for the distance calculations we analysed the remaining 26 specimens. The mean distance was 3.4 ± 1.2cm. Twenty-two cases (76%) crossed between 2.7cm and 4.5cm. In 16 patients (55%), the distance from the lowest part of the incision to the nerve was 3.1-4cm. There were 3 cases between 0.1-1cm, and 1 between 6.1-7cm. Three cases were between 2.1-3.0cm, and 3 cases were between 4.1-5.0cm. Measurements between all three authors demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.80 and 0.78 respectively; Pearson correlation 0.80 and 0.88 respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the sural nerve crossed the posterolateral incision between 2.7cm and 4.5cm proximal to the tip of the fibula in 76% of cases. However, there remains individual anatomical variation, and we would recommend that care should be taken to look for the nerve closer to the achilles tendon proximally and nearer the fibula distally. We hope that this information can help surgeons plan their approach and minimise iatrogenic injury to the sural nerve.

Previous Article Anatomy of the posterior malleolar fracture
Next Article Anatomy of the tibial nerve in relation to the tarsal tunnel: a cadaveric study
Print

Documents to download


Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts

2024   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2023   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2022   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2021   -   Prize Winners  
2019   -   Podium  |  Poster
2018   -   Podium  |  Poster
2017   -   Podium  |  Poster
2016   -   Podium  |  Poster
2015   -   Podium  |  Poster
2014   -   Podium  |  Poster
2013   -   Podium  |  Poster
2011   -   All Abstracts
2009   -   All Abstracts
2008   -   All Abstracts
2007   -   All Abstracts
2006   -   All Abstracts
2005   -   All Abstracts
2004   -   All Abstracts
2002   -   All Abstracts
2001   -   All Abstracts
2000   -   All Abstracts
1999   -   All Abstracts
1998   -   All Abstracts
1997   -   All Abstracts
1996   -   All Abstracts
1995   -   All Abstracts
1994   -   All Abstracts
1993   -   All Abstracts
1991   -   All Abstracts
1990   -   All Abstracts
1989   -   All Abstracts
1987   -   All Abstracts
1985   -   All Abstracts
1983   -   All Abstracts