BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

Search

RSS Abstracts 476 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2013 64 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 24 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 40 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2014 36 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 36 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2015 49 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 20 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 29 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2016 45 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 18 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 27 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2017 40 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 15 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 25 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2018 47 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 22 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 25 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2019 48 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 25 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 23 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2021 15 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 10 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 6 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2022 46 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 23 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 23 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2023 46 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 23 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 23 Expand/Collapse
- RSS 2024 40 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Poster 18 Expand/Collapse
  - RSS Podium 22 Expand/Collapse

Categories: Abstracts, 2022, Poster

A cohort study of union following subtalar fusion dependent on the presence of an adjacent ankle fusion

T. Jennison, J. Dalgleish, S. Taher, C. Chadwick, C. Blundell, M. Davies, H. Davies

¹Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom

Introduction: Subtalar fusion is the surgical treatment of subtalar arthritis. There is a concern that subtalar fusions may have a higher non-union rate if there is an adjacent ankle fusion. The aim of this cohort study was to determine the rates of union for subtalar fusions with and without an adjacent ankle fusion. Secondary outcomes were to assess risk factors for non-union.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all patients that underwent a subtalar fusion in a single centre between 2010 and 2020. The primary outcome of union was determined based on bridging callous on radiographs. Chi squared test and Mann-Whitney tests compared differences in demorgaphics and risk factors for non-union between groups. A logistical regression model was performed to determine risk factors for non-union.

Results: There were 18 patients with an adjacent ankle fusion and 53 patients without. There were no significant differences in demographics between the two groups. Overall 46 (86.8%) of those without an ankle fusion fused, compared to 8 (44.4%) of those with an ankle fusion above (p=0.000). On multivariate logistic regression an adjacent ankle fusion was the only significant risk factor for non-union. When taking account of other risk factors for non-union the odds ratio of union of the subtalar joint with an ankle fusion present 0.1753 (95% CI 0.0449 - 0 .6843) compared to a subtalar fusion with a native ankle joint (P=0.012). 9.4% of patients without an ankle fusion underwent a revision subtalar fusion compared to 44.4% of those with an ankle fusion (P=0.001).

Conclusions: Patients undergoing a subtalar arthrodesis with an adjacent ankle fusion have a significantly increased risk of non-union compared to those with a native ankle. Patients with a previously fused ankle need counselling about the high risk of non-union and additional surgery.

Print

Tags: Hindfoot Arthrodesis

Documents to download

P15 subtalar fusion below ankle fusion(.pdf, 301.03 KB) - 644 download(s)

Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts